Information in Dice Masters...
by, 07-28-2015 at 06:38 PM (951 Views)
The questions I posted can be seen to the right...
Later in the article I will talk about the response my questions got, on Facebook, and I will say now that I am going to be somewhat critical of some of the opinions put forth.
And I will also give, and expand on, my own answers to those questions.
But, first I want to talk a little about some of the thinking behind my opinions.
One thing to note, and understand, in considering these categories is that they are point-of-view agnostic. That is to say, they do not consider information from any single player's perspective, but rather consider it from an abstracted, semi-omniscient, point of view.
So, where does "how many dice are in my opponent's bag" fall in to these categories?
It divides game information in to two sets:
- Knowable information is anything that can be known by any participant in the game.
Almost all information in Dice Masters is knowable.
- Unknowable information is that which cannot possibly be known by any participant in the game.
The only information in Dice Masters that falls in to this set is what dice will be pulled from a bag when it contains 5 or more dice, and what faces will come up on dice when they are rolled. Although we can calculate probabilities of different outcomes, they are just probabilities and the actual outcomes can not be known until they happen.
This category measures the degree to which any individual player has access to a given piece of information in relation to the other participants in the game.
It also divides that information into two sets:
- Open information is anything that is or can be known to all players equally.
In Dice Masters it includes almost everything that is Knowable.
- Closed information is anything that is only known by one, or some subset, of the players.
The only information in Dice Masters that is closed is that which is in each player's head - their strategy, and what they plan to do next to help them achieve that strategy.
This measures the degree to which that information can be deduced from the physical components of the game and their positions and states.
Once again it divides the information in to two sets:
- This is anything that can be deduced solely from the game pieces, their physical positions and states.
In Dice Masters this includes, but is not limited to:
- what characters and actions are in play, their costs, and abilities,
- the levels of any fielded or unfielded characters, and their stats,
- the number of dice in the various zones, and what type of dice they are.
- Derived information is anything that is not Free.
Examples of derived information include, but are not limited to:
- the amount of damage, if any, done to dice in the field,
- the turn on which a particular die was purchased,
- errata or rulings regarding a particular card.
We can answer this by asking ourselves a series of simple questions:
- Is the information Knowable?
Plainly the answer to this question is "Yes". One or both players can know this information. At the very least the player with the dice in their bag can simply look, and count for himself.
- Is the information Open?
This is less obvious, but again the answer here is "Yes". Though the information can not be directly seen by either player, it can be obtained by both.
- Is the information Free?
This is less clear cut, but I would again answer this with a "Yes". Both players know, at the start of the game, how many dice are on each card. From this they can deduce how many of each has been purchased. Add this number to the 8 Sidekicks a player always starts with and subtract the total visible in play, and you arrive at precisely how many dice are in your opponent's bag.
Well, before I answer those questions, I first want to address some of the responses I got to my questions on Facebook.
I got a lot of positive responses, which were all in the form of something like "Yes, I ask my opponent, and answer when asked. The information can be easily worked out, and it speeds the game along to ask, and to answer."
But I got, what I thought were a surprising amount of negative responses. These fell in to two broad camps:
- "I enjoy counting the dice, and consider it a tactical part of play".
These responses I have no problem with, and I respect their right to wish to play that way.
- "You have no right to ask", "Your an idiot if you can't count", "Asking is cheating", "Counting is stalling".
These responses I do have a problem with. It is this kind of attitude amongst players of any game that turns many people off. It is unsporting, offensive, and in some cases condescending. We as a community should, in my opinion, do everything we can to discourage this kind of attitude within the game.
EDIT: There were also many negative responses from those on the pro-asking side of the argument - "Not answering is stalling", "I would not play with people who did not answer", "I would slow play if they did not answer", and so on - this attitude is just as problematic, and should be equally discouraged, as the strongly negative anti-asking stance.
So, what about my answers?
- Do you do it?
Yes. If knowing how many dice are in my opponents bag is important to a game decision I am about to make, then, for the sake of brevity, I will directly ask my opponent.
- Do you answer honestly when asked?
Yes. Again, for the sake brevity, I will always answer, and will always answer honestly, when asked.
- Do you think it should be explicitly allowed in the tournament rules?
Before I posed these questions my answer to this would have been "No. I believe this is a matter of good gaming etiquette and believe that these issues should not be explicitly covered by the tournament rules, beyond very general rules about good sportsmanship". However, given the very divided nature of the responses given, I now think that this probably should be covered in the tournament rules.
- Do you think answering honestly should be explicitly required by the tournament rules?
If this issue is to be addressed in the tournament rules then, yes, it should be explicitly ruled that players must answer the question honestly. Not doing so should be seen as cheating.
- Do you think 'dice counting' is an important part of the game?
I think knowing how many dice are in your opponents bag is an important part of the game. I do not think that being expected to track that information should be.
- Do you think not answering, or not answering honestly, is pointless as all the information in the game is open and, well, I can waste five minutes of every turn counting how many of each die you have, if you really want me to, or you could just tell me?
Absolutely yes. Regardless of whether this is in the tournament rules, to not answer, or to answer dishonestly, is petty at the very least.
- Does whether you are playing online, over Google Hangout or Skype, or not affect your answers to the above questions?
For me no. However, I think the importance of asking, answering, and answering honestly, is increased when playing via Hangout or Skype, because it is harder to track all the information required to deduce the information for yourself. Particularly when not all dice on cards are visible in frame.
EDIT: But, equally, we should respect the wishes of those that think otherwise.
Let's strive to keep the friendly, helpful, attitude amongst the players of this wonderful game, and keep the games flowing, and fun, whilst competitive.
Keep rolling those dice, and may the dice gods bless you.